relationships

heart sand

You have Parent Issues even if you don’t think you do

It is obvious that our parents have an almost inconceivable effect on our development as human beings, and most of us can accept that. Whether you vote the way your parents do or reject that completely, you’re reacting to how you were brought up; the conversations, the assumptions, the influences. And when someone has had a tragic or abusive childhood, we can envisage why that might have messed them up. We can see that impact because it’s in popular culture, in TV and paperbacks in WH Smith with pictures of sad children on the cover. But more and more (and more) I am realising the impact that familial relationships have, not just on our development as a human being but on the very way we form relationships. However conscious we are about our decision making, most of us don’t realise the extent to which we are recreating patterns in our personal lives.

Does this sound a little self-helpy? I can see that. It’s probably symptomatic of the sort of literature that I read and the sorts of things I’ve always been interested in that this rings so true with me. The people I’m interested in (in a literary sense) are often cerebral types, often recovering addicts, people who have had a lot of therapy. I also like Jillian Michaels, the trainer from The Biggest Loser, who is- I think it’s fair to say- not a particularly cerebral type. But she is a person who understands the destructive nature of her relationship with her father growing up, and how that makes her react, in a very real way, to authority figures in her own life. When the people I’m interested in kept saying the same thing in many different ways, it slowly started to dawn on me that it made sense.

This shit makes sense! www.5lovelanguages.com/
This shit makes sense! www.5lovelanguages.com/

The problem is that because we live our own experiences and our perception is our reality. It is often very hard to see that it might be worth questioning the conclusions we’re drawing. I’ve been racking my brains for an example that isn’t vague, or boring. Of course when you have an interaction with someone and they appear preoccupied we can read that as them being rude, or having something on their mind, or interpret ourselves as boring or not worthy of their attention. But without a specific example, it’s all a bit blah. So I’ll give you mine.

In my early twenties I was almost always in a relationship and I assumed it would never be that difficult to find another. A little further into my twenties, I found myself single and working in the City, and it was suddenly much harder to meet someone. It wasn’t hard to meet people in general but it was sure as shit extremely hard to meet anybody worth spending any time with. That obviously excludes the unbelievable friends I made  there and continue to be close to: they’re gorgeous. The harder I tried the further away what I wanted seemed to be, like trying to catch a fish in your hands. I’d have dates, and second dates, and sometimes more, just to have the person disappear. Any time I got comfortable, that person would ghost on me, so of course I went into every relationship being scared that would happen. “We all have those fears!”, I hear you cry, and of course we do. But until I was in a relationship that felt like a team, where I felt secure, I couldn’t see how utterly terrified I had been in the early stages of the relationship that it would all crumble. It was a pathological fear, a physical feeling that M would leave me. I put it down to the ghosting morons. Now, 798 high-brow podcasts later, I am struck by the truth of the realisation I had a couple of months ago: my fear that the person I love will reject me is as a direct reaction to my fear that love would be withdrawn as a child.

I’m not going to criticise or blame, that’s not the point. I just feel more free and more calm realising that love felt conditional in my childhood and  that it’s had an impact. I also had a lot of unconditional love and continue to have that, and that is nourishing and has made me a lot of who I am. I just also deeply feel that love can be withdrawn.

Look, I don’t think having a critical parent with their own issues qualifies me to write a misery memoir called Why won’t you love me? My point isn’t self-pity, my point is that I have reflected on this one small element of what affects the dynamics of my relationship and it feels very true and runs very deep, and holy shit where does that leave us all? We’re screwed, doomed to repeat patterns that we don’t even recognise! I suppose some people can identify some of the many fibres that form the whole, to a greater or lesser degree. But even just taking a second to think about your opinion or emotion or irritation or resentment, taking a moment to hold it up to the light and to think about the years that went into it, the assumptions and pain, well I think that might be worth it. Holding up Not Going to Prezzo and examining it, maybe I’ll find that it turns to dust. Don’t get me started on Ways I Need To Be Shown I’m Loved. I’m trying, OK?

 

Category: Life
heart sand

We only ever argue about two things…

As I was getting ready to go out this afternoon, it occurred to me that M and I argue about only two things: ‘issues’ and ‘dinner’. I recognise, of course, that we’ve been together under two years and that there are plenty of things just round the corner that can cause schisms and upset. But we also haven’t had an easy time of it, with life-threatening illness and bereavement causing stress and pulling us closer together in our first year. The first few months of our relationship reflected pretty well the intense people that we can definitely be. And for the most part we rode those waves and continue to do so, whereas add in a political concept after a night out and we’ll entertain the whole carriage.

Ahh, argument lubricant!
Ahh, argument lubricant!

Obviously booze plays a part- we both love a drink and we go to a lot of comedy and gigs together so the journey home is like drunken Question Time with only lefties. But to be honest, we can argue about this stuff all day and all night, sober. And so often we barely disagree with each other but we’re both such irritating Guardian readers that we have to debate the details for an entire journey home. I remember the first time: I don’t know where we were coming home from but I know we argued the entire way, and for about an hour and a half when we got in, about whether  as a terrorist it was ever justified to use civilians as targets. I dare say we went round and round the same arguments for hours but neither of us could believe what the other was saying. Other recent examples include a row about whether it is ok to give money to a beggar, bearing in mind that it’s more effective to give to charities that support the homeless. And Saturday’s argument was over whether M would characterise himself as a feminist or not. Leftwingproblems.

The other thing we argue about is much trickier to work through because it combines the thing that we’re both pretty good at- communicating honestly with each other- and the thing we’re not- expressing what we want when we know it contradicts what the other wants.  We argue, regularly and with tears, about where to eat dinner. In the past. We both play down where we want to go and try to be flexible, and the other doesn’t know we’re doing it and resentment builds. Minor, petty resentment that we find it hard to put into words and then comes spilling out after a bottle and a half of rosé. The anger that we’ve compromised and the other doesn’t appreciate it.

I love eating out! But this pasta sucked!
I love eating out! But this pasta sucked!

My part in all this is that I cannot state my preference without overwhelming guilt. As I sit here, that sounds bizarre and I can’t explain it, but in the moment it’s the most ridiculous thing- I can’t say “M, I don’t feel like Nando’s”.  If it’s something he fancies then I just really want him to have that and I feel uncomfortable arguing for my own preferences. Part of this will be that I come from such a close-knit group of women, who double-check and re-confirm at every step of the decision-making process, that I partly expect someone to argue for my choice even if I’m not. I also have some messy little self-worth issues that play in to it. And what of M? He’s so much happier than me to say what he wants and yet it seems he still doesn’t.

But we’re making progress. It’s finally, after the last argument we had, out in the open and being talked about more fully. I’m not sure why this has taken so long but I guess every relationship is a work in progress. I think we’re both aware that it extends to other things, like our hobbies and the films we want to watch, but we just have to be more frank with each other. It’s the sort of small flaw in a relationship that if we don’t nip in the bud, can extend to how we spend our weekends, holidays, and beyond. Neither of us are passive aggressive in general at all but it’s a symptom of knowing we’re both opinionated people, I think, that finds us trying to rein ourselves in. Thankfully we’ll probably never stop debating the minutiae of lefwing politics- which is fine as that’s what makes us us.

Category: Life
Luke Barnatt

Cage fighting for girls

When M mentioned in his online dating profile that he liked ‘mixed martial arts’, I barely registered it.  I feel that way about most sport; not fundamentally opposed, just vaguely indifferent.  Yes, anything that gives me an excuse to go to a pub, and drink and shout has a certain appeal, but I’ve just never found it in myself to really care.  So with this mention of ‘cage fighting’ pretty much ignored in favour of the many other noteworthy statements on his profile- veritably overflowing with noteworthy statements as it was- we exchanged messages, texts, we met, and we were pretty much together, give or take a couple of conversations, from that point on.  Little did I know, the spectre of this ‘cage fighting’ loomed, and it loomed large.

The closest thing to mixed martial arts (or ‘MMA’ if you’re an acronym enthusiast) I’d ever watched was a few rounds of boxing. I’ve never found it particularly hard to understand why people enjoy boxing; whether it’s a sport you like or not, watching two athletes take part in something so skilled yet fundamentally, well, kind of barbaric, is something I can see the appeal of.  I’ve just never liked the feeling; the enthusiasm for wanting to see one man beaten into submission by another.  I don’t want to bay for blood!  Traditionally, I’ve disengaged and removed myself from the room.  In the populist view, take away the ‘gentlemanly’ rules of boxing and you have cage fighting: no rules, bloody, akin to human cock fighting (that might be something different altogether, come to think of it). Amoral.  Without a doubt, the most palatable and easy introduction to MMA is the Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC).  And that’s where all your preconceptions seem to implode.

Davey Grant, of TUF 18, cornering at Cage Warriors. I think he looks pretty scared.
Davey Grant, of TUF 18, cornering at Cage Warriors. I think he looks pretty scared.

They have lights!  They fill massive sporting venues!  They have celebrities in the audience!  The UFC is the sort of production that makes it easy to acquiesce and say reluctantly “go on….”. I didn’t become a fan right there and then, and I didn’t fill with excitement at the idea of sitting down to watch ‘the fighting’ on a regular basis.  But the barrier was gone.  My inner geek had been teased out and had seen a whole world of boring stats to learn, and a cast of heroes and villains to get to know. A whole subject I’d never given a moment’s thought to, but that there is just so damn much to know about. You have two men matched to fight; weighing up to 19st, whose muscle and mass can be completely different, who are inches apart in height, and have completely different skills.  There’s racial diversity like you’d see in barely any other sport.  It’s easier for the rich kids who can afford to train all the time, of course, but there’s fighters from every background, country, and class. Wiry little fighters like angry whippets, waiting for the opportunity to grab their opponent and wrestle him to the ground. Heavyweights who slug it out for five rounds, each with knockout power but barely able to stand at the end. And so my introduction to the weird and wonderful world of MMA was a headlining middleweight title fight on a UFC event. A fight that was a proper game changer, an upset, an iconic battle between Anderson ‘The Spider’ Silva and Chris Weidman.  It took that fight to expunge those feelings of middle-class guilt and unease with combat sports: I wasn’t sold, but the line had been crossed.

There are amusing and eloquent characters in MMA, as there are in every sport and especially in a promotion like the UFC that is shown on Fox in the US. They’ve got the money to throw at supporting programmes and hype that can showcase fighters’ personalities, skills, and rivalries.  It has the advertising and sponsorship revenues, and is able to invest in huge Vegas events.  That’s not to say that other promotions, like Cage Warriors and BAMMA in Europe, aren’t fun too, they just don’t have the ridiculous glitz and faux-respectability of the UFC.  But that’s not what’s drawn me in.  That can all be fun, and I’ve watched some fights that had me on the edge of my seat and looking from between the fingers I’m hiding behind, but the thing that gets me excited, the thing that makes me actively go and read this here and that there, are the women fighters.

Amanda Kelly was so lovely, even though she'd lost her fight that night.
Amanda Kelly was so lovely, even though she’d lost her fight that night.

Only fighting in the UFC since March 2013, women MMA fighters have, I imagine, had that same hard road that so many female athletes do in comparison to their male counterparts.  Lack of interest from the public, fewer chances to compete, next to no prospect of making a living from the sport.  But with the UFC’s purchase of Strikeforce, a rival promotion, and the establishment of a women’s division in both the UFC and Cage Warriors, it’s all starting to change. There’s also an all women MMA promotion called Invicta that was starting to gain traction globally before it was snapped up by the UFC. It’ll be weak for a while as the pickings will be slim, and there will inevitably be fights that allow dumb-bone MMA fans to continue to dismiss female fighters.  But, competitors like ‘Rowdy’ Ronda Rousey, an Olympic judoka and a big enough star in the US to be launching her Hollywood career with appearances in The Expendables and Fast & Furious franchises, will pave the way for a generation of female fighters.  And as a woman in love with a man who loves fighting, and a feminist who sees the work we still have to do on equality in this world, it’s quite exciting to see how these women are going to get on in such a male-dominated arena.   And if that’s the way I have to sell to myself the reality of watching women break each other’s arms, then, for now, so be it.

Ronda is my favourite! And she's getting better all the time..
Ronda is my favourite! And she’s getting better all the time..

Epilogue: I wrote this in January 2014 and apart from a few additions and edits, it’s the same article I originally put together. However, I have since found myself enjoying MMA more and more. I’ve loved going along to the events- UFC, Cage Warriors, and BAMMA- and I’m loving having my personal favourites and developing my own knowledge and opinions. With the launch of season 20 of the UFC’s reality TV show The Ultimate Fighter, which is all-female and will crown a straw-weight champion at the end, women’s MMA is bigger and more exciting than ever. We’ve just seen world-class boxer Holly Holm signed to the UFC in the same weight class as Ronda Rousey and Cat Zingano returned last night after almost a year and a half away, and great personal tragedy, to a convincing, exciting, and emotional victory.

When I wrote this piece my interest in Mixed Martial Arts was just beginning, and it was an exciting new world. I don’t feel that the piece above is my best writing, but I did want to be true to those initial feelings and put it up. Eight months later, this is a sport that has really captured my imagination, and I can’t imagine this is the last you’ll hear about it from me…. Who knows- if you give it a go, you might surprise yourself!

You can read my TUF 20 episode reviews over on Schpunk!

The TUF 20 fighters! I am LOVING it!
The TUF 20 fighters! I am LOVING it!

 

Picture credits:
Ronda Rousey – USA Today

TUF 20 Cast – Wombat Sports

 

 

Category: Life
heart sand

On M being late

M has nightmare time-keeping.  I have no doubt that this fact provides my lady family members with not a little glee, as I’m not exactly known for my slavish devotion to arriving on time.  I’m what I would call a solid ten-minuter: I’m almost always 5-10 minutes late, usually through underestimating how long something (a shower, the walk to the station) will take me. And even when I haven’t assumed I can blow-dry my hair in a minute and a half, I factor in no wriggle room so if a tube doesn’t come immediately I am, yet again, running late.  I’m rarely so late you could be annoyed with me, but I’m like sand under the fingernail, irritating you.

So what better punishment than to love deeply a man who procrastinates himself into constant lateness?  I am very uptight about travelling when it involves something that can’t be changed, like a flight, a funeral, a pre-booked train.  I am happiest when I can get to the airport two and a half to three hours before the flight, so that I can relax and have breakfast, and feel smug.  It’s true that I haven’t yet flown with M, and I’m sure that’ll be a post all of its own…  For now, I mainly have his every-day lateness to deal with.

The man is awesome in a million ways and moaning about lateness is dull for everyone, so I will just sum it up by saying that he struggles to get going- and lord knows, so do I- but he completely ignores the fact that time is getting on and just says “in a minute”.  We can end up leaving hours after we originally agreed to.  I am still trying to tackle this and the furthest I’ve got is to tell myself that there’s no deadline.  Except when there is.

His other timekeeping skill is saying he’ll be done in a certain amount of time and then it being absolutely nowhere near.  Case in point, two weeks ago: he said he’d be done in 30 minutes: we ended up meeting an hour and a half later.  I don’t mind that it took that long!  It can’t be helped!  But not having that information, or an update, stops me from being able to make an informed decision.  If it’s 30 minutes, I’ll work late; an hour and a half and I’ll go to Westfield for the shops, or a glass of champagne and a read.  And that is too, too frustrating.

I enjoy a glass of fizz. Regularly!
I enjoy a glass of fizz. Regularly!

But this has led to a major- and healthy-revelation to me.  Communication is all-important but when all is said and done, the only person’s behaviour you can affect is your own.  It’s a big thing for me to realise because it’s so counter-intuitive for me.  If someone (ok, M) is late and not that great at communicating how late he will be, then the natural reaction is either to get passive aggressive and annoyed, or to take that person at their word and be caught out sitting and waiting and feeling like you’ve missed out.  I’ve chosen in the past not to go for that glass of champagne because I don’t want to keep him waiting, and then been disappointed and hurt that he’s not there when he said he would be, and I still didn’t get the champagne.  I’m not negating my own feelings, and it would be nice if he could estimate and stay in touch a little bit better.

But if I want the champagne I should have the champagne; if I don’t I only have, to some extent, myself to blame.  It’s not unfair to take care of yourself and it avoids the petty gripes and niggles a little.  Communication is important but it’s a hard-to-swallow truth that you can only affect your own actions (and reactions).  It would be passive aggressive to think “right, I’m buggering off then”, but thinking it would be nice to do something with the waiting time, and knowing that it’s not unreasonable to please yourself in that situation, is very freeing.  I tend to worry that if M arrives exactly when he says he will, that it would be awful to not be instantly available.  But that just adds to the potential reservoir of resentment.  When push comes to shove, if I’m having champagne when M arrives, he really won’t begrudge the fifteen minutes it takes for me to finish it. And I won’t begrudge the time I’ve spent waiting, and pleasing myself.  But I still don’t know how to solve the politics of procrastination.

Category: Life
heart sand

On living with M

I lived in a house with one or more parents until I was 34.  Seeing that written down feels weird, but for the most part that’s because other people reading it will find it weird; while there were frustrations, sharing a house with my mum didn’t get in the way of much and there’s always been a bunch of beds/sofas/mattresses at friends’ houses to choose from.  It was just the way it worked out for various reasons- some stemming from my parents’ divorce, some not-  and I’ve always had an unusually close, supportive, and respectful relationship with my mum.  I also have never had any desire, even when I’ve felt a mite stifled or childish, to live on my own.  Friends, family, a partner: yes.  But not on my own: that’s a very quick way to minor depression for me.

When I met M I think we tried not to move too quickly, even while emotionally we were speeding out of sight.  We didn’t see each other every night, and work trips and my social life (and the fact that M couldn’t really have one) meant that we had space from each other.  Except that by six months I was staying at M’s house so often, and hanging there even when he was out, that the writing was pretty much on the wall: we live together now.

I had always taken the view that moving in together would be huge, and if the timing was wrong that it could spell absolute disaster.  And I still think that, but I feel that at my age I’m in a better position to know what I want and what I’m able to adapt to.  And in so many ways it’s felt stupidly easy.  I’ve sat in bars and pubs asking my co-habiting friends whether they found it difficult when they first moved in together: I keep waiting for the other shoe to drop.  Or I did.  It turns out that I had interpreted my difficult to be the same as other people’s difficult, which it isn’t.  We split the chores, and although we’re both messy and that can irritate, we’re mostly pretty considerate people.  Where I realise my difficult comes in to play is when it comes to feelings.  I have all the feelings, and I’m a naturally very emotional person.  I’m also resilient, supportive, and fairly alright company, and my emotional side makes me a better friend and partner.  But I do realise that I’m used to living with someone who’s known me all my life and who’s able (pretty much) to gauge my moods and knows the tricks to make me feel better, or to take care of me.  Which me and M are still navigating.  We have an agreement that I need to signpost M to what I need because I’m not that easy to read, and also because I’ve had those very emotional relationships and he hasn’t in the same way.  But it’s not easy when you’re upset to tell someone that you feel they’re handling the situation wrong or you need something else.  I try to guess what people need and I think I do ok but it’s ridiculous to expect anyone to be able to do that with me.

I also have a characteristic that I’m sure can be very tiring for the person I live with. I have a need for things to feel special, or an occasion, or marked in some way.  I’m not sure where it comes from, or rather I do but I can’t quite articulate it.  I know I want to be present and I like things to be deliberate- I really am not one for channel-surfing and ending up with half an old episode of Only Fools and Horses.  I think the concept of ‘occasion’ is a throwback to my childhood: up until quite late in my parents’ marriage, occasions such as birthdays, Christmas, and holidays were sacred.  People put aside their differences and made nice for a couple of days, and we had fun things to eat and drink.  I can’t quite unpick exactly where this need comes from and why I need a sense of ceremony on a bog-standard Saturday night, but I do.  I do my best not to dictate our weekends, and it’s worth noting that somehow marking the evening can be as small as picking something nice for tea, or watching a film instead of something from the Sky planner.  It’s just important to me that we’re present, I guess.  Similar to my feelings about marriage, I want to be actively being in our relationship, not coasting or sleepwalking through it.

I carry with me a fear, always, that I am being emotionally demanding or dictatorial.  While I think we are usually excellent communicators, a recent row proved that pussyfooting around and thinking that we’re being considerate essentially ends up amounting to (benign) dishonesty, and potentially feeling a bit hard done by.  It’s a tricky balancing act between signposting a need and making a demand, I suppose.  But we’re not doing too badly.

Category: Life